Monday, March 21, 2016

Today we conclude our study in “the reliability of the Bible.” On Friday, we began our two-part blog entry on the uniqueness of the Bible. We examined how the Bible is unique in its circulation, unique in its translation, and unique in its survival. Today we will study the Bible’s uniqueness in its teaching and influence.

4.      The Bible is unique in its teaching.
The Bible is a historically accurate and detailed book. In The Cambridge Ancient History, we read, “The Israelites certainly manifest a genius for historical construction, and the Old Testament embodies the oldest history writing extant.” Consider The Table of Nations in Genesis 10. The Table of Nations provides an astonishingly accurate account of history that lines up with what one would learn in an ancient world history class. Archaeologist Professor W.F. Albright wrote, “It stands absolutely alone in ancient literature without a remote parallel even among the Greeks” or Romans, who were known for being quite meticulous in their early histories. While there are places and people mentioned in the Bible that archeological digs have yet to uncover, there have been no discoveries which discount the people and places referred to in Scripture. It has yet to be disproven.

Lewis Chafer, founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, wrote, “The Bible is not such a book a man would write if he could, or could write if he would.” We see evidence of the first half of this statement in the diversity of personalities in the Bible. The level of honesty in the Bible about the sins and failures of its heroes was unknown in the ancient world.

Consider today’s writing style versus that in ancient eastern cultures. We are accustomed to modern biographies which are often avant garde and highly concerned with detail, absolute accuracy, and skepticism about facts until they can be verified. Modern biographers are less interested in painting people in a positive light and far more concerned with painting an accurate picture of a person, even if it means highlighting one’s moral failures and exposing the skeletons in his or her closet. In fact, biographers are often met with successful book sales if they can dig up factual information that taints a person’s character or calls into question what the public thought to be true about a person.

This, however, was not the case with ancient biographies. These works, often called hagiographies, are most concerned with painting a broad picture of one’s impact. At times, they exaggerate a person’s abilities or traits even to the point of bending the truth—all in an attempt to make them look favorable. The purpose of the hagiographer was not to get every detail nailed down, but to prove what a remarkable person their subject was in history.

Unlike the literature of its time, the Bible contains very earthy material about its supposed heroes—flaws and failures. Take Peter, for example. Peter is called “petros”, meaning “the rock”. He was one of the key disciples in the establishment of the church in Rome. But the Bible includes the embarrassing detail of Peter’s denial of Christ. This points to the reliability of the text. Why would the author invent that part of the storyline? At that point in history, one would not include the rejection of Peter’s Lord if it was an invented story.

Another example is the women at the tomb as the first eyewitnesses to Jesus’ resurrection. The Siddur, or Jewish prayer book, contained a prayer for men that read, “Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a woman.” A woman’s testimony was not accepted in a court of law. At that point in history, if a person wanted to invent and fabricate the details of the resurrection, the last audience he would choose to witnesses the resurrection of Jesus are women. So why women? Because they were the ones to whom Jesus first chose to reveal Himself!

Also consider the little details recorded in Scripture, such as the account in the Gospel of John when Jesus is on the shore following His resurrection. The disciples have returned to their fishing career, and reminiscent of their first meeting, Jesus tells them to cast their nets on the other side. They do not realize it is Jesus speaking to them, but perhaps because they had been fishing all night with nothing to show by daybreak, they obey His command. Their net teamed with so many fish that they were unable to haul it in at first. John records that there were 153 fish. Why include this detail? Numerologists think there is meaning in every number and attempt to figure out what 153 “means”. But there is no hidden code in that number. All it means is that someone counted them because they were fishermen. And this detail is recorded in Scripture because the story is true!

5.      The Bible is unique in its influence.
The Bible is utterly unique in its influence on culture and history. No other book comes close. Think about the Bible’s influence on art, music, literature, and government. It is unparalleled in history.

Consider the incredible musicians and their scores that have been inspired by Scripture: Handel’s Messiah, Mozart (who was not a Bible-believing Christian, but some of his best pieces were inspired by the Bible), pop singers, and gospel songs.

Consider the amazing works of art inspired by the Bible: Michelangelo’s David and The Sistine Chapel, Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper, Vincent van Gogh’s The Good Samaritan and The Raising of Lazarus, and over 100 pieces by Rembrandt.

Consider the wonderful works of literature inspired by the Bible: works by Dante, William Shakespeare, John Steinbeck, Charles Dickens, John Donne, and John Milton. The list is endless.

Phillip Schaff writes, “If every Bible in every city were destroyed, you could reconstruct it entirely from the quotations on the shelves of public libraries.”

Consider the orphanages, schools, universities, hospitals, missions, and charitable organizations that have been established because of the influence of the Word of God on people’s lives.

One of the criticisms that you hear about Christianity is the evil done in the name of God, among which include the Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, and the Crusades. There are some dark spots in our history of trying to follow God. But all of this pales in comparison to the massive amount of good because of the influence of God’s Word on people’s lives.

So we close out this series of posts by returning to the reason that we believe the Bible is God’s holy, inspired, infallible, inerrant Word. I choose to believe the Bible because it is a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. These eyewitnesses report supernatural events that took place to fulfill specific prophecies and they claim their writings are divine rather than human in origin.

The implications of all of this? Devote yourself to knowing the Word of God!


Pastor Jeff Frazier

No comments: